A Budget for Business?
- Reduction in corporation tax rates – 24% this April down to 22% from 2014
The Budget was good news for businesses. The reduction in corporation tax rates now means that, for the first time, entrepreneurs can have a successful company and in due course sell it, paying tax on profits and gain on sale of less than 30% overall.
- Long awaited relaxation of Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) rules, following consultation
The new low rates of corporation tax and new CFC rules are designed to make the UK more attractive to inward investors.
- EMI share option scheme limit more than doubling – staff eligible for shares worth up to £250,000
The EMI rules are to be made more flexible and the increase in limits is welcome, but won’t affect that many people.
Chancellor clamps down on anti-avoidance
- Stamp Duty loopholes start to be closed
Stamp duty avoidance through offshore companies has been widely criticised. The Chancellor today announced a new punitive rate of 15% stamp duty land tax (SDLT) on properties costing more than £2 million bought by an offshore ‘envelope’. These vehicles will now also pay capital gains tax (CGT). This is a good start, but UK property is still under-taxed in the hands of non-residents. UK property in an offshore envelope company will still be outside the scope of inheritance tax and non-UK resident individuals will still pay no CGT on UK property. However, UK residents owning property abroad will usually be within the scope of tax in the country where their property is located.
- Following initial consultation a General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) will be brought in next year
Graham Aaronson QC’s review has recommended a GAAR. Commentators are mixed on how flexible this will be, whilst understanding the need to clamp down on unacceptable tax avoidance. We need to see the detail on this to ensure that normal commercial transactions will not get caught. HMRC can be over-zealous, so cautious optimism only at this stage.
- New Capital Gains Tax rules on offshore companies
Sub-sale relief is to be closed and SDLT on properties costing more than £2 million will increase to 7% at midnight tonight. This shows that the Government is serious about using SDLT as a revenue raising measure. Clearly, a one-off SDLT charge is more practical than the proposed mansion tax, which was full of inconsistency.
Personal tax changes more modest than expected
- 50% tax rate down to 45% from next year
The Chancellor was very clear that his research had shown that far less tax was raised from the 50p rate than anticipated. This accords with our experience that 50p tax plus 2p National Insurance represents a tipping point. The new rate is expected to bring in more money but the ‘hidden’ top rate of 60% tax remains in force for a tranche of income just above £100,000, at which point personal allowances are withdrawn.
- Personal allowances increased to £8,105 this year and £9,205 next year
Raising personal allowances is a priority of the Coalition Government with pressure to hit £10,000 and bring the lowest earners out of the charge to tax altogether. This has to be a good idea for the tax administrators and for the individuals, but in the current economic climate Government is unable to increase the limits any faster.
- Child benefit to be withdrawn for higher earners
Child benefits for higher earners have proved to be a political football. To counter criticism, these will now be phased out for families where a worker earns more than £50,000 and is fully withdrawn if they earn more than £60,000. This is more subtle than the previous ‘in or out’ proposal, but what will it cost to implement?
Aquascutum: Partner Marc Voulters thoughts on the sale
by SRLV on 11 May 2012
It made perfect sense for YGM, who own the rights for the Aquascutum brand in South East Asia and Japan, where the brand has high awareness and is incredibly popular.
I suspect that YGM feels that they had to buy the brand and maintain the provenance and history in the UK, otherwise the brand would collapse in their own existing territories.
So in itself, it’s not really the saving of a heritage brand, more of an expedience for someone to be able to protect their investment.
{ 0 comments }